Black, Epstein, Maxwell, and the Datafication of America’s Children – Part 2

by | Nov 11, 2025 | Epstein Files | 0 comments

There’s another layer to this story that makes the Tel Aviv connection impossible to ignore, and that is the OTHER Maxwell daughters. If you haven’t read part one, start here.

The Maxwell Daughters

Robert Maxwell had nine children. While his daughter Ghislaine became infamous for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation, two of his other daughters built careers in Israeli technology and intelligence database integration. Isabel and Christine Maxwell, twins born in 1950, moved into these sectors after their father’s death in 1991.

After their father’s empire collapsed and he died under mysterious circumstances, both sisters entered technology fields that would prove remarkably relevant to what Apollo would later build at McGraw-Hill.

Isabel Maxwell deliberately sought out Israeli technology companies, drawn by her father’s lifelong support for Israel. From 1997 to 2001, she served as President of Commtouch, an Israeli-American email security and threat detection company. Then from 2003 to 2004, she became CEO of Puresight, an Israeli company specializing in content filtering and monitoring technology.

Both companies were Israeli firms building surveillance and filtering capabilities.

Christine Maxwell co-founded Chiliad, whose software was officially contracted by the U.S. Department of Defense and deployed enterprise-wide across the FBI’s classified network after 9/11 for federated search and data fusion. Public records confirm FBI use but do not specify whether the system extended to CIA or NSA databases.

Think about that, though. The daughter of a man who was under FBI counterintelligence investigation for allegedly accessing NSA databases created the software that would be deployed across the FBI’s classified network after 9/11. The same FBI that had investigated her father for potential intelligence activities hired his daughter’s company to build their most sensitive post-9/11 intelligence infrastructure. This one is worth looking for more official confirmations of along with some solid answers.

Who vetted this? Who approved it? What due diligence was conducted on whether Christine Maxwell’s family connections posed any counterintelligence risk? No public record shows these questions were ever asked.

Christine also worked as Program Manager of Learning Technologies at the University of Texas at Dallas. She is the only documented Maxwell family member with direct involvement in educational technology.

By the early 2000s, the Maxwell daughters had developed expertise in three critical areas.

Isabel’s expertise: Israeli surveillance and content filtering technology.

Christine’s expertise: Data mining across disparate intelligence databases. And educational technology systems.

Then in 2003, their sister Ghislaine compiled a birthday book for Jeffrey Epstein in which Leon Black wrote a poem celebrating their friendship. Ten years later, Black’s Apollo Global Management would acquire McGraw-Hill, the same company their father had partnered with decades earlier, and, according to reports, proceed to invest $700 million building surveillance infrastructure that combined all these technical capabilities.

The Technical Complementarity

The technical parallels are striking.

Christine’s Chiliad enabled intelligence agencies to search across multiple classified databases. McGraw-Hill’s Engrade unified all district software systems to enable searching across multiple educational databases.

Isabel’s companies built Israeli surveillance and filtering technology. Apollo established McGraw-Hill’s Tel Aviv Technology Innovation Center as the global “Interoperability Hub.”

Christine worked in educational technology systems. Apollo is reported to have invested $700 million building educational surveillance infrastructure.

Whether this represents coordination, coincidence, or something else entirely, one fact is clear. The Maxwell family developed technical expertise in surveillance, data mining, and educational technology during the two decades between Robert Maxwell’s death and Apollo’s McGraw-Hill acquisition. And when Apollo built America’s largest educational surveillance infrastructure, it used the exact capabilities the Maxwell daughters had spent those decades perfecting. Does that sound like a coincidence?

The Data Breach That Revealed the Scale (2022)

In December 2022, security researchers discovered that McGraw-Hill had left a database exposed online containing 22 terabytes of sensitive student data.

According to reports from vpnMentor, TechSpot, Higher Ed Dive, and SiliconANGLE, the breach affected over 100,000 students and included full names and email addresses, course assignments and grades, student performance data and behavioral tracking, academic progress records, and assessment results and learning patterns.

The data sat publicly accessible for an unknown duration, possibly months or years. The breach wasn’t discovered by McGraw-Hill’s security monitoring or regulatory oversight. It was found by independent security researchers who then struggled for three months to get the company to respond.

No regulatory penalties were assessed. No federal investigation was announced. No executives faced consequences. But this was just one database. McGraw-Hill operates multiple platforms serving tens of millions of students. How much data exists across all their systems? Where is it stored? Who has access to it?

What the Privacy Advocates Found

Common Sense Media, a leading privacy advocacy organization, evaluated ALEKS and gave it only a 59% basic privacy score. The evaluation revealed something disturbing.

Personal information was displayed publicly. User-created content was not filtered for personally identifiable information before being made publicly visible. Encryption practices for data transmitted over the internet were unclear. Encryption practices for data stored on servers were unclear. Data breach notification policies were unclear. Whether McGraw-Hill performs regular privacy and security audits was unclear.

The platform displayed behavioral or targeted advertising to students. Whether third-party advertising or tracking services collected student data was unclear. Whether student data was used to create profiles for targeted advertisements was unclear. Whether that data was used to track and target ads on other websites was unclear.

No clear data retention policy was indicated. Whether students could delete their data was unclear. Whether inaccurate data could be corrected was unclear. Processes for accessing data were available, but modification and deletion rights were murky.

Think about what this means. McGraw-Hill says ALEKS has served over 50 million students. The platform tracks every answer, every mistake, every moment of struggle, every instance of procrastination. It monitors behavioral patterns, learning velocity, exact progression through material. According to McGraw-Hill’s own technical documentation, the platform has logged billions of student interactions over 25 years.

The company calls these “knowledge spaces.” Detailed maps of each student’s cognitive strengths, weaknesses, and learning patterns. But the most troubling questions remain unanswered. How long is this data kept? Who can access it? Under what circumstances? Can it be sold? Can it be shared with law enforcement? With intelligence agencies? With future employers?

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s investigation into educational surveillance, these platforms routinely collect far more data than necessary. Behavioral metadata revealing procrastination patterns and optimal study times. Biometric patterns embedded in typing speed and mouse movements. Social network data showing which students interact and how. Location data. Device information. Search terms and browsing history when platforms are integrated with school devices.

ALEKS collects granular behavioral data on every interaction. Not just whether a student got an answer right or wrong, but how long they took, when they hesitated, what patterns of mistakes they made, when they showed signs of giving up. According to academic research on the platform and the company’s own claims, ALEKS uses machine learning to map each student across what McGraw-Hill describes as “trillions of possible knowledge states.”

What looks to be just educational data is actually psychological profiling of children when you really look at what it’s collecting. Detailed maps of how they think, how they learn, how they fail, where they’re vulnerable. Data that persists indefinitely with no clear retention limits.

Federal law provides no mandatory retention periods for educational technology vendors. While FERPA requires schools to keep certain records for specific periods, typically five to six years for temporary records and sixty years for permanent academic records, there are no corresponding requirements forcing vendors like McGraw-Hill to delete student data after students graduate or leave the system.

Children who used ALEKS in 2013 are twenty-seven or twenty-eight years old now. They’re entering their careers, starting families, applying for security clearances, and running for public office. Their cognitive profiles, behavioral patterns, learning struggles, and psychological vulnerabilities were documented during their most formative years in middle school, high school, and early college. That data still exists somewhere.

When security researchers discovered McGraw-Hill’s twenty-two terabyte data breach in 2022, something remarkable happened. Actually, nothing happened. No regulatory penalties were assessed. No federal investigation was announced. No executives faced any consequences whatsoever.

Let’s think about this too for a moment. The Department of Education has the legal authority to withdraw funding from educational institutions that fail to protect student data under FERPA. They could have acted but they didn’t.

Your children’s behavioral and cognitive profiles are sitting in cloud servers right now, and at this point in the technology revolution, that seems reasonable. But is the data designed to profile our children accessible under terms we never agreed to? They’re supposedly protected by regulations that have no real enforcement mechanism it seems. And they’re overseen by agencies that took no action even when twenty-two terabytes of student data sits publicly exposed for anyone to access.

According to McGraw-Hill’s own public statements, they actively use student interaction data to “perfect the intelligent machine responsible for ALEKS’ unique ability” to profile each student. That one is worth really reading again. Billions of student interactions are being fed into machine learning systems. These systems are creating ever more sophisticated models of how American children think and learn. The more data they collect, the better they get at predicting and profiling young minds.

I don’t want to be an alarmist but I feel it’s fair to ask these questions. Who authorized this? Who’s watching it? Who really controls that data? Who has access to those models? What could intelligence agencies, political campaigns, or foreign governments do with detailed cognitive and behavioral profiles of an entire generation of Americans? These questions should have been asked in 2013 when Apollo acquired the company, when the Tel Aviv center opened, and when Epstein’s hundred and seventy million dollar payments to Black came to light. Nobody asked. Nobody investigated. And America’s children remain under surveillance.

The Yacht That Won’t Stay Quiet

There’s one more detail that happened just two weeks ago.

In 1986, Saudi businessman Emad Khashoggi, nephew of Adnan Khashoggi, the notorious arms dealer with deep CIA connections, commissioned a superyacht from Amels shipyard in the Netherlands. The 180-foot vessel cost approximately $20 million. That same year, before it was even completed, Robert Maxwell purchased it and christened it the Lady Ghislaine after his youngest daughter.

The yacht became Maxwell’s floating command center. In 1991, he moored it on New York’s East River while negotiating his purchase of the New York Daily News. In May 1989, according to multiple news reports, Maxwell hosted a party aboard the Lady Ghislaine. Among the guests were Donald Trump, Robert Maxwell, and Ghislaine Maxwell.

On November 5, 1991, Maxwell’s body was found floating in the Atlantic Ocean near the Canary Islands. He had disappeared from the Lady Ghislaine during the night. The official verdict was accidental drowning, though speculation about suicide or murder has never ceased.

After Maxwell’s death and the exposure of his massive fraud, the yacht was sold to an unidentified Arabian businessman who owned it for the next 26 years, renaming it Lady Mona K. In 2017, the yacht was purchased by Anna Murdoch Mann, Rupert Murdoch’s first wife, to whom he was married from 1967 to 1999. According to news reports, she didn’t know the yacht’s history when she bought it. She had it refitted and renamed it Dancing Hare.

Think about that progression. A yacht commissioned by the nephew of a CIA-connected arms dealer, purchased by an alleged intelligence asset who died on it under mysterious circumstances, then owned by the ex-wife of Maxwell’s direct business rival.

And then, on October 14, 2025, just two weeks ago, the Dancing Hare caught fire while docked at the Wharf in Washington, D.C.

DC Fire and EMS responded to reports of smoke coming from the vessel. According to their statement, firefighters found an electrical fire on the yacht’s upper deck and extinguished it. Fire officials said the cause was an electrical malfunction. No injuries were reported.

The yacht where Maxwell died, that passed through the hands of Middle Eastern arms dealers and ended up owned by Murdoch’s ex-wife, catches fire in the nation’s capital in October 2025, just as Senate investigations into the Epstein network intensify and questions about educational surveillance and intelligence connections remain unanswered.

You could consider this all a coincidence, but when you’re investigating a pattern that connects intelligence assets, convicted sex traffickers, billionaire financiers, and the surveillance of American children, there are no small details. There are only questions that demand answers.

The Questions Nobody Will Answer

So now I ask again. When Apollo acquired McGraw-Hill in 2013, did anyone examine what systems from the Maxwell era remained in the company’s infrastructure, if any? When McGraw-Hill established the Tel Aviv center in December 2013, did anyone investigate where U.S. student data flows or who has access, especially given the previous connections to Maxwell? When Black’s payments to Epstein spiked during the acquisition period, did anyone investigate whether Epstein had any role in the deal?

The answer to all these questions appears to be no.

When the Dechert investigation examined Black’s relationship with Epstein, it explicitly refused to investigate whether Epstein facilitated Apollo business activities. When Senate investigators asked Black whether he discussed Apollo business with Epstein, he invoked his right not to answer. When Bank of America processed $170 million in payments to a convicted sex offender and waited seven years to report it, no criminal charges were filed against bank executives.

The pattern of non-investigation is as consistent as the pattern of investment.

Senator Ron Wyden has uncovered Treasury Department files containing details on at least $1.5 billion in Epstein-related transactions across multiple banks. The files reportedly contain names of women and girls potentially trafficked, along with paper trails showing how Epstein financed his operations. Despite repeated requests, the Trump administration has refused to provide these files to Senate investigators. The IRS, despite Senate referrals showing evidence of potentially fraudulent tax schemes, has conducted zero audits of any transactions or structures Epstein devised for Black.

The Pattern

An alleged intelligence asset under FBI investigation controlled America’s second-largest textbook company from 1989 to 1993. His daughters spent the next two decades developing expertise in Israeli surveillance technology, intelligence database integration, and educational technology systems. Twenty years after Maxwell’s death, a billionaire who paid Jeffrey Epstein $170 million acquired the same company and invested $700 million building comprehensive student surveillance infrastructure, including a Tel Aviv data center.

When security researchers discovered 22 terabytes of exposed student data in 2022, no one was held accountable. When Senate investigators asked questions about the Epstein-Black-Apollo connection, they hit walls at every turn. When anyone tried to investigate whether these patterns connect, they were told there was nothing to see.

Every fact in this investigation can be verified through Senate investigations, court records, FBI files, financial disclosures, corporate documents, security breach reports, and verified news sources. The evidence is overwhelming. And yet every investigation has been carefully structured to avoid the most obvious questions. What are we going to do about it? Will anyone in a position of authority finally ask why?

Full Sources

SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE INVESTIGATIONS

U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “Wyden Releases New Information on Financing of Jeffrey Epstein’s operations by Billionaire Leon Black,” March 12, 2025

https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/wyden-releases-new-information-on-financing-of-jeffrey-epsteins-operations-by-billionaire-leon-black-seeks-documents-from-trump-administration

  1. U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “Wyden Unveils Ongoing Investigation Into Private Equity Billionaire Leon Black’s Tax Planning,” July 25, 2023
  1. U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “New Wyden Bill Would Force Treasury to Turn Over Epstein Files,” September 10, 2025
  1. U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “Continuing Epstein Investigation, Wyden Probes IRS’s Failure to Investigate Sex Trafficker’s Highly Lucrative Tax Planning Work,” July 31, 2025
  1. U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “Following New Epstein Revelations, Wyden Renews Demand for Trump Administration to Produce Epstein Files,” June 17, 2025
  1. U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “As Trump Sits on Key Epstein Files, Wyden Lays Out ‘Follow the Money’ Investigation for DOJ,” July 23, 2025
  1. U.S. Senate Finance Committee – “As Bessent Withholds Epstein Files, Wyden Expands Investigation and Demands Financial Records,” September 3, 2025
  1. Senator Ron Wyden – Letter to DOJ, Treasury Department, and FBI regarding Epstein investigation (PDF), June 17, 2025
  1. Senate Finance Committee – Letters and official correspondence (2022-2025) detailing Black’s refusal to cooperate with investigation
    • Available through Senate Finance Committee archives

HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE INVESTIGATIONS

  1. Rep. Jamie Raskin – Letter to Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan regarding Epstein transactions, October 8, 2025
  1. Rep. Jamie Raskin – Letter to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon regarding Epstein transactions, October 8, 2025
  1. U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democrats – “Ranking Member Raskin Probes Top Banks Over $1.5 Billion in Suspicious Transactions Linked to Jeffrey Epstein Sex Trafficking Ring,” October 9, 2025
  1. U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democrats – “Ranking Member Raskin’s Statement on New Lawsuits Targeting Major Banks Over Epstein Ties,” October 15, 2025

DECHERT INVESTIGATION & APOLLO DOCUMENTS

  1. Dechert LLP – Independent Review of Leon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, January 2021 (filed with SEC as exhibit to Apollo Global Management Form 8-K)
  1. Apollo Global Management – Press Release: “Apollo Global Management Announces Conclusion and Release of Independent Review,” January 25, 2021
  1. Dechert LLP – Firm announcement: “Dechert Concludes Investigation on Behalf of Apollo Global Management’s Board,” March 2021
  1. Apollo Global Management – SEC filings and investor disclosures (2013-2021)

VIRGIN ISLANDS SETTLEMENT

  1. Settlement Agreement and Release – Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands and Leon Black, January 20, 2023
    • Referenced in Senate Finance Committee documents
    • Key statement: “WHEREAS, Jeffrey Epstein used the money Black paid him to partially fund his operations in the Virgin Islands”
    • Settlement amount: $62.5 million for criminal immunity
  1. CNN Business – “Leon Black agrees to pay $62.5 million to avoid Jeffrey Epstein-related lawsuits in the US Virgin Islands,” August 5, 2023
  1. St. Thomas Source – “Report: Billionaire Leon Black Paid V.I. $62.5 Million Over Epstein Ties,” July 21, 2023
  1. Artnet News – “Financier and MoMA Trustee Leon Black Agrees to Pay $62.5 Million to Settle Jeffrey Epstein-Related Claims in the Virgin Islands,” July 25, 2023
  1. Bloomberg – “Leon Black Headed Off Jeffrey Epstein Lawsuit in US Virgin Islands Deal,” July 21, 2023

BANKING AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT

  1. CNBC – “Epstein bank records sought by top House Democrat from Jamie Dimon, other CEOs,” October 9, 2025
  1. Banking Dive – “Senators probe Bank of America on Apollo co-founder’s payments to Epstein,” April 16, 2024
  1. CBS News – “Bank of America sued over alleged financial ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein,” October 2025
  1. The New York Times – “Bank of America Flagged Suspicious Payments to Epstein Only After He Died,” December 13, 2024
    • Referenced in Congressional testimony
  1. Common Dreams – “Raskin Demands Bank Records in Probe of $1.5 Billion in ‘Suspicious’ Transactions Tied to Epstein,” October 9, 2025

MCGRAW-HILL DATA BREACH

  1. vpnMentor – “Report: World-Renowned Education Company Exposes Details of Over 100,000 Students Worldwide in Massive Data Breach,” December 2022
  1. TechSpot – “McGraw Hill breach exposed 22 terabytes of sensitive student data,” December 22, 2022
  1. Higher Ed Dive – “McGraw Hill exposed student data and grades, online privacy firm says,” December 19, 2022
  1. SiliconANGLE – “Education company McGraw Hill exposes student data on unsecured cloud storage,” December 19, 2022
  1. The Register – “McGraw Hill’s S3 buckets exposed 100,000 students’ grades,” December 20, 2022
  1. BestColleges – “Student Information Exposed in McGraw Hill Data Breach,” December 22, 2022
  1. Oregon State University – Official Notice to students regarding McGraw Hill data breach, December 22, 2022
    • University official communications (archived)

APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT & MCGRAW-HILL ACQUISITION

  1. S&P Global (formerly McGraw-Hill Companies) – “The McGraw-Hill Companies Completes Sale of McGraw-Hill Education to Apollo,” March 22, 2013
  1. McGraw Hill – “Platinum Equity to Acquire McGraw Hill from Apollo Funds for $4.5 Billion,” June 15, 2021
  1. Publishers Weekly – “McGraw-Hill Education to be Acquired by Private Equity Firm Apollo,” November 26, 2012
  1. PitchBook – “This day in buyout history: Apollo conducts a textbook takeover,” March 22, 2018
  1. Wikipedia – “McGraw Hill Education”
  1. Apollo Global Management – Press releases and SEC filings regarding McGraw-Hill acquisition (March 2013)
    • Available through Apollo investor relations and SEC filings
  1. McGraw-Hill Education – Investor presentations (2013-2017)
    • Available through company archives

PRIVACY AND DATA SECURITY

  1. Common Sense Media – “Privacy Evaluation for ALEKS”
  1. Common Sense Media – “Privacy Report for Aleks”
  1. Common Sense Education – “ALEKS Review for Teachers”
  1. Common Sense Media – “New Report from Common Sense Media Assesses Privacy Policies of Hundreds of Education and Consumer Tech Apps and Services,” November 17, 2021
  1. Electronic Frontier Foundation – “Spying on Students: School-Issued Devices and Student Privacy,” February 2018
    • Available at EFF.org (comprehensive investigation into educational surveillance practices)
  1. McGraw-Hill Education – Privacy Center and Data Security Policy
  1. Cosyn, E., Uzun, H., Doble, C., & Matayoshi, J. – “A practical perspective on knowledge space theory: ALEKS and its data,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 101, 2021
    • Academic journal article detailing billions of student interactions and knowledge space mapping
    • DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102512
  1. ALEKS Corporation – “About ALEKS” and “Research Behind ALEKS – Knowledge Space Theory”
  1. Center for Democracy and Technology – “Commercial Companies and FERPA’s School Official Exception: A Survey of Privacy Policies,” February 2021
    • CDT.org research report
  1. Public Interest Privacy Center – “Fixing FERPA: Enhancing EdTech Accountability”
    • Analysis of accountability gaps in educational technology oversight
  1. Future of Privacy Forum – “Student Privacy Primer” and student data privacy resources
    • Available at StudentPrivacyCompass.org
  1. MIT Press Reader – “Privacy and Paternalism: The Ethics of Student Data Collection,” September 2022
  1. ConnectSafely – “The Educator’s Guide to Student Data Privacy,” May 2025
    • ConnectSafely.org educational resources
  1. U.S. Department of Education Privacy Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) – FERPA guidance documents
    • Available at studentprivacy.ed.gov
  1. Record Nations – “FERPA Compliance In Education” (60-year retention requirements for permanent records), August 2024
    • Industry compliance documentation
  1. State educational data retention policies – Arizona, Indiana, North Carolina, Washington
    • Available through respective state education departments

ROBERT MAXWELL & INTELLIGENCE BACKGROUND

  1. The Times of Israel – “The Maxwells: Scandal, conspiracy and more than a few days in court,” July 4, 2020
  1. The Times of Israel – “For writer who broke Epstein case, a rumored Mossad link is worth digging into,” July 26, 2021
  1. The Times of Israel – “Ghislaine Maxwell’s family history marked by scandal, secrecy and conspiracy,” December 30, 2021
  1. The Times of Israel – “From wooden shack to global media magnate: The rise and fall of Robert Maxwell,” February 28, 2021
  1. The Times of Israel – “Did father Robert Maxwell’s early abuse taint Ghislaine long before she met Epstein?” January 5, 2023
  1. Thomas, Gordon – “Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul,” St. Martin’s Press, 1999
    • ISBN: 978-0786706037
  1. Council for the National Interest (Philip Giraldi) – “The Maxwells: Mossad’s First Family of Spies,” December 9, 2020
    • Available at councilforthenationalinterest.org
  1. FBI files on Robert Maxwell – Partially declassified documents
    • Available through MuckRock FOIA requests and investigations
  1. Preston, John – “Fall: The Mystery of Robert Maxwell,” Viking, 2021
    • ISBN: 978-0241346914
    • Comprehensive biography with new revelations

MAXWELL FAMILY TECHNOLOGY VENTURES

  1. Commtouch/CYREN – Corporate records and filings
    • Israeli cybersecurity company, Maxwell family involvement documented in corporate filings
    • Available through Israeli corporate registry
  1. Puresight/iCognito – Corporate documentation
    • Content filtering software company
    • Maxwell family technology investments
  1. Chiliad – Corporate records and FBI technology procurement documentation
    • Data analytics company
    • Government contracts available through federal procurement databases
  1. University of Texas at Dallas – Employment records
    • Maxwell family members’ academic and business affiliations
    • Available through university archives

LADY GHISLAINE / DANCING HARE YACHT

  1. WUSA9 – “Yacht once named ‘Lady Ghislaine’ catches fire in DC Wharf neighborhood,” October 14, 2025
  1. USA TODAY – “Yacht once owned by Ghislaine Maxwell’s father catches fire in DC,” October 16, 2025
  1. Yahoo News/The Telegraph – “Yacht named after Ghislaine Maxwell catches fire in Washington DC,” October 15, 2025
  1. DC Fire and EMS Department – Official statements regarding yacht fire, October 14, 2025
    • Official Twitter/X posts and press releases
  1. Marine Industry News – “Superyacht once named after Ghislaine Maxwell catches fire in Washington DC,” October 16, 2025
  1. Wikipedia – “Dancing Hare” (yacht history and ownership records)
  1. Boat International – “Dancing Hare yacht (Amels, 57.7m, 1986)”

NEWS COVERAGE & ANALYSIS

  1. Bloomberg – “Epstein’s Work for Leon Black Should Face IRS Probe, Wyden Says,” August 1, 2025
  1. The Art Newspaper – “US Senator calls for investigation into MoMA trustee Leon Black’s business ties to Jeffrey Epstein,” August 19, 2025
  1. CNBC – “Senate panel probes billionaire Leon Black’s $158 million in payments to Jeffrey Epstein,” July 25, 2023
  1. CNBC – “Apollo Global CEO Leon Black paid sex predator Jeffrey Epstein $158 million for financial advice after conviction,” January 26, 2021
  1. Axios – “What we now know about Leon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein,” January 26, 2021

https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/mcgraw-hill-sold-by-apollo-global-management

Fox Business – “McGraw Hill sold by Apollo Global Management,” June 16, 2021

Written By Kait Justice

undefined
More Posts by Kait

Related Posts

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *